40 Machine Learning Interview Questions

Are you prepared for questions like 'What is cross-validation and why is it important?' and similar? We've collected 40 interview questions for you to prepare for your next Machine Learning interview.

Did you know? We have over 3,000 mentors available right now!

What is cross-validation and why is it important?

Cross-validation is a statistical method used to estimate the skill of machine learning models. It’s aimed at overcoming the problem of overfitting while also maximizing the use of data. The idea is to split your dataset into two segments: one to train your model, and the other to validate that it’s working well.

Standard practice is to take 70-80% of your data to train the model, then use the remaining 20-30% for testing. But there's a potential problem here: you might get lucky and just happen to pick a training subset that makes your model look really good when in fact, it's not.

To tackle such issues, we use cross-validation, specifically k-fold cross-validation. Here, the dataset is divided into k groups or folds. Then, we iteratively train the model k times. Each time, we use one of the folds as test set and the remaining k-1 folds as the training set. This makes sure that every observation from the original dataset has the chance of appearing in training and test set. This is mainly useful in scenarios where the objective is to predict future data points.

The beauty of cross-validation is that it allows us to use the entire dataset for both training and testing, providing a more accurate measure of how our model would perform on unseen data.

What is a decision tree in machine learning? When would you use it?

A decision tree is a supervised machine learning model used for classification and regression tasks. As the name suggests, it uses a tree-like model of decisions based on specific rules. At each node of the tree, it considers a feature from the input set and splits the data based on a condition related to that feature. This procedure is applied recursively resulting in a tree structure with nodes and branches, until it reaches nodes without any further splits, known as leaf nodes which contain the output.

One advantage of decision trees is their interpretability. They are simple to understand and visualize, as they mimic human decision-making processes. They can handle both categorical and numerical data and are also robust to outliers.

They're often used in scenarios where it's important to understand the logic behind a prediction, such as medical diagnosis or credit risk analysis. In these contexts, not only do you want an accurate model, but you also want to understand and explain the basis on which it's making predictions. For example, to understand why someone was denied a loan, you can trace the decision path in the tree. Despite these advantages, they can be prone to overfitting if not properly pruned, and are sensitive to the specific data they're trained on.

Given two related datasets, how would you determine which features are most important?

To determine the most important features in the datasets, we employ methods known as feature selection techniques. The idea here is to select a subset of input features that contributes most to the output feature.

There are multiple techniques available for feature selection, depending on the nature of the data and the model being built.

If the model is linear or logistic regression, you could look at the coefficients' values. Higher absolute values indicate higher significance.

Another technique is using correlation coefficients and correlation matrices to see the relation between each of the independent variables with the dependent one.

Another common method is using tree-based models like Decision Tree or Random Forest. These models provide a feature importance score that indicates how useful or valuable each feature was in the construction of the tree decision models.

Yet another method is Recursive Feature Elimination, which works by recursively removing features, building a model using the remaining attributes and calculating model accuracy.

Remember, though, it's essential to validate your model after feature selection to ensure it’s still accurate and predictive.

Can you explain the difference between supervised and unsupervised machine learning?

Supervised and unsupervised machine learning are two core types of learning methods. In supervised learning, we provide the machine learning algorithm with labeled training data. We essentially 'supervise' the learning process by telling the algorithm the output it should aim to predict. It's like a teacher-student scenario where the algorithm learns the pattern from the labeled examples provided. This is used quite often in tasks like regression and classification.

On the other hand, unsupervised learning involves training the model on unlabelled data. Here, the algorithm needs to identify patterns and relationships within the data on its own. It's not guided with the correct answers and must find insightful connections independently. This type of learning is useful for tasks such as clustering and association.

How would you evaluate a machine learning model?

Evaluating machine learning models involves checking their performance by using certain metrics and comparing them to see the best fit. The choice of metrics depends on the nature of your machine learning task.

For classification problems, metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1 score are often used. You might also look at the confusion matrix, which provides detailed breakdown of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative predictions. For more nuanced insight, you might consider looking at the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and AUC-ROC score, which summarizes the trade-off between the true positive rate and false positive rate.

For regression tasks, common metrics include Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). You can also use R-squared and Adjusted R-squared metrics, which represent the proportion of variance for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable or variables in a regression model.

Additionally, cross-validation is often used during the model selection process. Instead of splitting the data just once into a training set and a test set, you can use cross-validation to get a more reliable estimate of model performance.

Can you explain what ensemble learning is?

Ensemble learning is essentially a machine learning paradigm where multiple learners, usually referred to as "base learners" or "weak learners", are trained to solve the same problem and then combine their predictions to make a final prediction. The main philosophy here is that a group of “weak learners” can come together to form a “strong learner”. Each learner brings in some level of expertise and when they vote or combine, it creates a much more accurate and stable model.

There are several types of ensemble methods, but three of the most common are bagging, boosting, and stacking. Bagging involves training multiple models, each on a different random subset of the data, and having them vote on the final prediction. Boosting works by training models sequentially, each trying to correct the mistakes of the combined learners before it. Stacking involves training models on the dataset, then combining the predictions of each model using another machine learning model.

These methods are often used because they can help improve the model's stability, reduce overfitting, and improve prediction accuracy over a single model.

What is the bias-variance trade-off?

The bias-variance trade-off is a fundamental concept in machine learning that describes the balance that must be achieved between bias and variance.

Bias refers to the simplifying assumptions made by a model to make the target function easier to approximate. High bias leads to a model being too simple, which can result in underfitting and misrepresenting the data, thus leading to more errors due to faulty assumptions.

Variance, on the other hand, refers to how much the target function will change if different training data was used. High variance models will drastically change their estimates with small changes in training data, leading to a model that's overly complex and overfits to the training data, capturing the noise along with the underlying pattern.

The trade-off comes in when trying to minimize these two sources of errors that prevent supervised learning algorithms from generalizing beyond their training set. As one increases model complexity to decrease bias, variance increases, leading to overfitting. On the other hand, reducing your model complexity to reduce variance increases bias, leading to underfitting. This is known as the bias-variance trade-off, and achieving a balance between them is key to building a model that generalizes well to unseen data.

How would you handle missing or corrupted data in a dataset?

Handling missing or corrupted data depends on the specific situation and the nature of the data. Let's discuss a typical approach.

To begin, it's essential to identify and understand the extent of the missing or corrupted data. This can be done using appropriate data visualization tools and data profiling methods. After identifying the magnitude of the problem, you then deal with the issue based on the percentage of data that's missing or corrupted.

If there's a small percentage of data missing, techniques like mean imputation or regression imputation could be used. However, if a significant portion of data is missing from an entire column or it is biased in some way, you might consider dropping the entire column. For categorical data, you might use the mode of the data.

When data is corrupted, the first step is identifying the corruption. Data could be corrupted due to various reasons like input errors, processing errors, transmission errors, etc. Once identified, you can either correct it if the source of corruption is known and uncomplicated, or discard it, if it's too complex and the data size is not massively compromised by its absence.

This is all a part of data preprocessing, which is essential in any data analytics or machine learning pipeline. Proper handling of missing or corrupted data helps in building robust and accurate predictive models.

Can you explain what a false positive and a false negative are?

False positives and false negatives are terms commonly used in binary classifications in machine learning. These concepts are best understood in the context of a confusion matrix, which is a table layout that allows visualization of the performance of a classification model.

A false positive is when the prediction is falsely flagged as positive. In other words, the model predicted that an event would occur when it actually did not. For example, in a medical diagnosis scenario, a test result indicating a disease presence when the disease is actually not present would be a false positive.

Conversely, a false negative is when the prediction is erroneously flagged as negative. This means your model predicted that an event wouldn't happen, but the event did actually take place. Using the same medical example, a test result indicating that the disease is not present when it actually is would a false negative.

The optimal prediction model would have a low rate for both false positives and false negatives, but according to the nature of problem we are dealing with, tolerance for these errors might vary. For instance, missing a serious disease (false negative) might be a more serious issue than falsely diagnosing it (false positive), depending on the context.

Can you describe how an ROC curve works?

In machine learning, an ROC curve, or Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, is a graphical plot that illustrates the performance of a binary classifier as its discrimination threshold changes. It's created by plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1-specificity) at various threshold settings.

Each point on the curve represents a different threshold. The top left corner of the plot is the “ideal” point, suggesting a perfect model with no false positives or false negatives. A point along the diagonal line suggests a “worthless” model that makes just as many bad predictions as good ones.

The area under the ROC curve, also known as AUC-ROC, serves as a measure of how well a parameter can distinguish between two diagnostic groups. An area of 1 represents a perfect test, and an area of 0.5 represents a worthless test.

In summary, ROC curves are a helpful diagnostic tool for understanding the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity and finding the most appropriate threshold for a particular problem.

Please explain the difference between L1 and L2 regularization.

Can you explain the concept of overfitting in machine learning?

How would you handle an imbalanced dataset?

Can you explain what logistic regression is and where it could be used?

What is the purpose of a loss function in machine learning?

How do you ensure you’re not overfitting with a model?

What are some differences between Gradient Descent and Stochastic Gradient Descent?

How would you implement a recommendation system for our company’s needs?

Can you explain Principal Component Analysis (PCA)?

What is the process of backpropagation in neural networks?

How familiar are you with programming and using machine learning libraries in Python?

How would you implement a neural network from scratch?

Can you explain how K-means clustering works?

Can you tell me about a time when you needed to improve the speed of your machine learning model? How did you achieve this?

Can you explain how a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) works?

What is Reinforcement Learning and how does it differ from traditional supervised learning?

What is batch normalization and why is it used?

What are the different types of machine learning? Can you give examples of each?

How do you choose between parametric and non-parametric learning algorithms?

What are hyperparameters in a machine learning model, and how do you decide on the best ones?

Can you explain what precision and recall are?

Can you demonstrate how to implement a support vector machine in Python?

What are the most common problems you might find in the data used for machine learning?

What role does a cost function play in machine learning models?

Can you discuss a time you used machine learning to solve a complex problem?

How would you handle large datasets with limited computational resources?

Can you explain the use of activation functions in neural networks?

What is your approach to ensuring data privacy when building machine learning models?

Can you discuss any recent advancements or trends in machine learning that you find exciting or promising?

How do you approach feature selection and engineering in machine learning?

Get specialized training for your next Machine Learning interview

There is no better source of knowledge and motivation than having a personal mentor. Support your interview preparation with a mentor who has been there and done that. Our mentors are top professionals from the best companies in the world.

Only 5 Spots Left

I've worked at Google, Facebook. and Databricks building teams and products in the AI/ML, Search and Recommendation, leading/managing anywhere from 2 to 200 person teams. At the same time, I have a very active life outside work, so I'm a strong advocate for work-life harmony. I love mentoring and guiding …

$120 / month
  Chat
1 x Call
Tasks

Only 2 Spots Left

Experienced Software Developer adept in bringing forth expertise in design, installation, testing and maintenance of large scale software systems. My career of over 10 years as a software developer has accomplished an expertise in building distributed highly scalable systems serving millions of users across the world, including an emphasis on …

$110 / month
  Chat
4 x Calls
Tasks

Only 1 Spot Left

WHY DO I WANT TO BE A MENTOR? Feeling not good enough? Don't think you are fit to be in the data science industry? Feeling lonely, stressed or even depressed? Wondering why you can't break into the industry? Wondering why no one is taking a chance on you? Considering additional …

$360 / month
  Chat
Tasks

Only 1 Spot Left

I lead a team of researchers to train large-scale foundation models for multimodal data. My day-to-day work involves research, engineering, and partnering with different stakeholders. I have mentored dozens of engineers, researchers, and students and also have been a teaching assistant for machine learning and data science courses. With a …

$200 / month
  Chat
1 x Call
Tasks

Only 1 Spot Left

Expertise in enabling, developing and deploying robust end-to-end data pipelines and machine learning models that have real world impact on a regular basis. Over the years, I have had the opportunity to work with and learn from some of the best minds at prestigious organizations like Mercedes-Benz and General Motors. …

$70 / month
  Chat
2 x Calls
Tasks

Only 2 Spots Left

As an AI Product Manager at Meta and Adobe, I've built and scaled multiple AI products serving billions of individuals and millions of businesses. I've also advised Fortune 500 companies on AI strategy and implementation as a Consultant at Deloitte. I love learning — I've earned degrees in computer science, …

$120 / month
  Chat
2 x Calls

Browse all Machine Learning mentors

Still not convinced?
Don’t just take our word for it

We’ve already delivered 1-on-1 mentorship to thousands of students, professionals, managers and executives. Even better, they’ve left an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 for our mentors.

Find a Machine Learning mentor
  • "Naz is an amazing person and a wonderful mentor. She is supportive and knowledgeable with extensive practical experience. Having been a manager at Netflix, she also knows a ton about working with teams at scale. Highly recommended."

  • "Brandon has been supporting me with a software engineering job hunt and has provided amazing value with his industry knowledge, tips unique to my situation and support as I prepared for my interviews and applications."

  • "Sandrina helped me improve as an engineer. Looking back, I took a huge step, beyond my expectations."